Futureville Reinvestment Act

Added some rules

When did Mack start leading the project?

Tiel wrote:

Jack Root wrote:

Tiel wrote:

Way to consult with the other builders, block.

I did as well.And the people on at the time didn't try to stop us so...

You built what, one building?

Block asked me to do it.

Tiel wrote:

When did Mack start leading the project?

Well he is our supreme leader.

Well, that killed it for me. I'm not going to build something to have it torn down because it doesn't meet someone's exorbitant standards.

Tiel wrote:

Well, that killed it for me. I'm not going to build something to have it torn down because it doesn't meet someone's exorbitant standards.

Well he is hardly on and he's just going to help me. Unless you make a nether tower with obsidian your building won't be destroyed.

blockman42 wrote:

Tiel wrote:

Well, that killed it for me. I'm not going to build something to have it torn down because it doesn't meet someone's exorbitant standards.

Well he is hardly on and he's just going to help me. Unless you make a nether tower with obsidian your building won't be destroyed.

sh*t.

I am creating a city, separate from FCV, in which there are no building requirements.

ACH0225 wrote:

I am creating a city, separate from FCV, in which there are no building requirements.

That city will probably turn into a disorganized mess.

blockman42 wrote:

ACH0225 wrote:

I am creating a city, separate from FCV, in which there are no building requirements.

That city will probably turn into a disorganized mess.

With the builders on here its hard for anything to be organized

Prime Arc Thunder wrote:

blockman42 wrote:

ACH0225 wrote:

I am creating a city, separate from FCV, in which there are no building requirements.

That city will probably turn into a disorganized mess.

With the builders on here its hard for anything to be organized

Thats why I have rules, but even then everyone becomes really defensive even when I clearly state it.

blockman42 wrote:

Prime Arc Thunder wrote:

blockman42 wrote:

ACH0225 wrote:

I am creating a city, separate from FCV, in which there are no building requirements.

That city will probably turn into a disorganized mess.

With the builders on here its hard for anything to be organized

Thats why I have rules, but even then everyone becomes really defensive even when I clearly state it.

Rules are good. Getting people to follow them; that's the trick. I'll support you 100%, because I know you are a good builder, and will make sure the city is of a high standard.


Anyway, I'm not going to destroy people's work; only remove it. A bit like the Weeping Angels from Doctor Who: they don't kill you, they just send you back in time and "live" you to death.

The Schmetterling wrote:

blockman42 wrote:

Prime Arc Thunder wrote:

blockman42 wrote:

ACH0225 wrote:

I am creating a city, separate from FCV, in which there are no building requirements.

That city will probably turn into a disorganized mess.

With the builders on here its hard for anything to be organized

Thats why I have rules, but even then everyone becomes really defensive even when I clearly state it.

Rules are good. Getting people to follow them; that's the trick. I'll support you 100%, because I know you are a good builder, and will make sure the city is of a high standard.


Anyway, I'm not going to destroy people's work; only remove it. A bit like the Weeping Angels from Doctor Who: they don't kill you, they just send you back in time and "live" you to death.

Perhaps move the not so good stuff to another city so people don't rage.

Sounds good but I know this sounds stupid, but would it be possible to have the server in offline mode (so cracked supporters of futurecraft can join) and use a password protection plugin to prevent any hacking.


And will bacon be allowed in the future? Or is it too obsolete?

Why no obsidian?

Bacon?

catsonmeth wrote:

Why no obsidian?

Because block is a player hater.

catsonmeth wrote:

Why no obsidian?

Because it is ugly and doesn't match the futuristic look of the city.

blockman42 wrote:

catsonmeth wrote:

Why no obsidian?

Because it is ugly and doesn't match the futuristic look of the city.

You're right, we should make it all iron. Oh, and you know what would make it look REALLY FUTURISTIC!? STONE! STONE EVERYWHERE! And, instead of using obsidian to make it look all shiny and old and define lines, we should use black WOOL to really bring out that lackluster that all futuristic buildings have.

catsonmeth wrote:

blockman42 wrote:

catsonmeth wrote:

Why no obsidian?

Because it is ugly and doesn't match the futuristic look of the city.

You're right, we should make it all iron. Oh, and you know what would make it look REALLY FUTURISTIC!? STONE! STONE EVERYWHERE! And, instead of using obsidian to make it look all shiny and old and define lines, we should use black WOOL to really bring out that lackluster that all futuristic buildings have.

Well stone and all other grey blocks represent concrete. Black wool is used as a defining block and is much better than a blackish purple volcanic rock. I also use a lighter block like red wool or blue wool as a defining block.

blockman42 wrote:

catsonmeth wrote:

blockman42 wrote:

catsonmeth wrote:

Why no obsidian?

Because it is ugly and doesn't match the futuristic look of the city.

You're right, we should make it all iron. Oh, and you know what would make it look REALLY FUTURISTIC!? STONE! STONE EVERYWHERE! And, instead of using obsidian to make it look all shiny and old and define lines, we should use black WOOL to really bring out that lackluster that all futuristic buildings have.

Well stone and all other grey blocks represent concrete. Black wool is used as a defining block and is much better than a blackish purple volcanic rock. I also use a lighter block like red wool or blue wool as a defining block.

Banning blocks (any block) from fv=dumb rule. People won't follow dumb rules and they get pissed off if anyone tries to enforce dumb rules and then they stop building in your city. So dumb rules mean less diversity and one or two lonely people building a city that will turn out to lack diversity in architecture. If you look, bluish/blackish/purpleish goes quite well with the futuristic theme.

Whoever fucked with my skyscraper: I will find you. And I will kill you. (or at least report you for griefing. Killing is a lot of work.)

catsonmeth wrote:

blockman42 wrote:

catsonmeth wrote:

blockman42 wrote:

catsonmeth wrote:

Why no obsidian?

Because it is ugly and doesn't match the futuristic look of the city.

You're right, we should make it all iron. Oh, and you know what would make it look REALLY FUTURISTIC!? STONE! STONE EVERYWHERE! And, instead of using obsidian to make it look all shiny and old and define lines, we should use black WOOL to really bring out that lackluster that all futuristic buildings have.

Well stone and all other grey blocks represent concrete. Black wool is used as a defining block and is much better than a blackish purple volcanic rock. I also use a lighter block like red wool or blue wool as a defining block.

Banning blocks (any block) from fv=dumb rule. People won't follow dumb rules and they get pissed off if anyone tries to enforce dumb rules and then they stop building in your city. So dumb rules mean less diversity and one or two lonely people building a city that will turn out to lack diversity in architecture. If you look, bluish/blackish/purpleish goes quite well with the futuristic theme.

Whoever fucked with my skyscraper: I will find you. And I will kill you. (or at least report you for griefing. Killing is a lot of work.)

I hate the use of the iron and obsidian mix that is commonly used in builds today, if you can give me a good example of a build with obsidian then I will allow the use of it in FV2

ACH's cruiser?

Keon wrote:

ACH's cruiser?

which cruiser?

blockman42 wrote:

catsonmeth wrote:

blockman42 wrote:

catsonmeth wrote:

blockman42 wrote:

catsonmeth wrote:

Why no obsidian?

Because it is ugly and doesn't match the futuristic look of the city.

You're right, we should make it all iron. Oh, and you know what would make it look REALLY FUTURISTIC!? STONE! STONE EVERYWHERE! And, instead of using obsidian to make it look all shiny and old and define lines, we should use black WOOL to really bring out that lackluster that all futuristic buildings have.

Well stone and all other grey blocks represent concrete. Black wool is used as a defining block and is much better than a blackish purple volcanic rock. I also use a lighter block like red wool or blue wool as a defining block.

Banning blocks (any block) from fv=dumb rule. People won't follow dumb rules and they get pissed off if anyone tries to enforce dumb rules and then they stop building in your city. So dumb rules mean less diversity and one or two lonely people building a city that will turn out to lack diversity in architecture. If you look, bluish/blackish/purpleish goes quite well with the futuristic theme.

Whoever fucked with my skyscraper: I will find you. And I will kill you. (or at least report you for griefing. Killing is a lot of work.)

I hate the use of the iron and obsidian mix that is commonly used in builds today, if you can give me a good example of a build with obsidian then I will allow the use of it in FV2

Here:



Here:



And here:




In my opinion, it is more about the builder than the colours. You use lime-green wool on your ships, and they look great. If Cool3303 used lime-wool on his ships, they would look horrible. Allow whatever blocks, but make sure the builds look good.