So, about that square/sphereical planet debate...

hyperlite wrote:

Planets should be shaped like this:

Spoiler:

The irony of this post is simply astounding.

At least I think it's irony. If it is in fact not...well played.

On my page I can't see the image, can anyone else see it? (it is a troll face, maybe forumotion auto-detects those and doesn't allow them )

Can't see it unless I click on it.

It's a transparent png. You posted a transparent troll image on a black background and had no idea it wasn't working. The troll you tried to troll us with trolled you. That is wonderful.

fr0stbyte124 wrote:

The troll you tried to troll us with trolled you. That is wonderful.

Sig'd

Oh I can click on it now, it is better in a way because you might be expecting it less, unless you read "Who saw that coming?" first. I can't even use a troll face. Stupid Wikipedia.

fr0stbyte124 wrote:

It's a transparent png. You posted a transparent troll image on a black background and had no idea it wasn't working. The troll you tried to troll us with trolled you. That is wonderful.

I am truly perplexed by your linguistic eloquence, and have now become inspired to forthwith use confounding idioms when displaying various aspects of my cognition and occasionally meta-cognition. I am, for the most part, confident that this current textual structure displays the later rather than the former.

However, in some pretexts, only one word can summarise my current or outmoded emotions:

"Meushka!"

_ wrote:

fr0stbyte124 wrote:

It's a transparent png. You posted a transparent troll image on a black background and had no idea it wasn't working. The troll you tried to troll us with trolled you. That is wonderful.

I am truly perplexed by your linguistic eloquence, and have now become inspired to forthwith use confounding idioms when displaying various aspects of my cognition and occasionally meta-cognition. I am, for the most part, confident that this current textual structure displays the later rather than the former.

However, in some pretexts, only one word can summarise my current or outmoded emotions:

"Meushka!"

Big words...

_ wrote:

fr0stbyte124 wrote:

It's a transparent png. You posted a transparent troll image on a black background and had no idea it wasn't working. The troll you tried to troll us with trolled you. That is wonderful.

I am truly perplexed by your linguistic eloquence, and have now become inspired to forthwith use confounding idioms when displaying various aspects of my cognition and occasionally meta-cognition. I am, for the most part, confident that this current textual structure displays the later rather than the former.

However, in some pretexts, only one word can summarise my current or outmoded emotions:

"Meushka!"

I don't think that last one was a word.

fr0stbyte124 wrote:

_ wrote:

fr0stbyte124 wrote:

It's a transparent png. You posted a transparent troll image on a black background and had no idea it wasn't working. The troll you tried to troll us with trolled you. That is wonderful.

I am truly perplexed by your linguistic eloquence, and have now become inspired to forthwith use confounding idioms when displaying various aspects of my cognition and occasionally meta-cognition. I am, for the most part, confident that this current textual structure displays the later rather than the former.

However, in some pretexts, only one word can summarise my current or outmoded emotions:

"Meushka!"

I don't think that last one was a word.

No, it is just fun to say. Try it. Go on, you know you want to...

It is sort of pronounced Meesh-ka