| | Which Dangerous Engine????? |  |
|
+11hyperlite Avenger_7 Commander Kobialka Commander Error Caramell scout37 Keon ACH0225 fr0stbyte124 Iv121 Cheatmaster 15 posters |
|
| Which Overlight Engine should be used? | | Hyperspace Jump | | 36% | [ 10 ] | | Quantum Gates | | 18% | [ 5 ] | | Warp | | 43% | [ 12 ] | | Simply Overlight by disabling Physics | | 3% | [ 1 ] |
| | Total Votes : 28 | | | | Poll closed |
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
hyperlite
Captain
Posts : 1529
Join date : 2012-01-18
| Subject: Re: Which Dangerous Engine?????  Fri Jun 22, 2012 10:22 am | |
| And then make a new player area where the big fleets can't camp and blow up little ships just coming into space. | |
|
| | |
Hierarch Fenway
DEV
Posts : 1196
Join date : 2011-10-26
Location : |]||o|{o}-H--X-)|(
| | Subject: Re: Which Dangerous Engine????? Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:31 am | |
| I get it! Sort of like, Slip-Space. It's extremely difficult to stay in it (Hence Slip-Space) But it is like the Nether in travel, Distances travelled there are maybe, 32-64 times the distance in space.
And Owls, we will soon not be using Chemical Rockets. I heard of plans for a Mass Driver being finalized to launch up Mount Everest, Chemical Rockets for the final 1000 meters into orbit, then an advanced Nuclear Salt Water Rocker and/or Ion Drive engine pairs to get up to speed. Oh, and Solar Sails. | |
|
| | |
Keon
Lord/Lady Rear Admiral 1st
Posts : 3076
Join date : 2012-01-17
Location : Hahahaha.
| | Subject: Re: Which Dangerous Engine????? Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:42 am | |
| - Fenway wrote:
- I get it! Sort of like, Slip-Space. It's extremely difficult to stay in it (Hence Slip-Space) But it is like the Nether in travel, Distances travelled there are maybe, 32-64 times the distance in space.
And Owls, we will soon not be using Chemical Rockets. I heard of plans for a Mass Driver being finalized to launch up Mount Everest, Chemical Rockets for the final 1000 meters into orbit, then an advanced Nuclear Salt Water Rocker and/or Ion Drive engine pairs to get up to speed. Oh, and Solar Sails. Thats not enough. How about something like 1 minute for 4 light years. Also, you can't be pulled out out of a server system. | |
|
| | |
Julo
Recruit
Posts : 204
Join date : 2012-07-06
Age : 28
Location : Somewhere in Space
| | Subject: RE: Which dangerous engine Sun Jul 08, 2012 2:54 am | |
| I think if you come from a different server/system you should be invulnerable, but in the time in which you are invulnerable you can't fire weapons.
I think the effect should last 10s.
But if you got an engine and not a Gate you could spawn where no other players/NPC's are. | |
|
| | |
Talon
Newbie
Posts : 30
Join date : 2011-11-20
Location : That place where people live
| | Subject: Re: Which Dangerous Engine????? Sun Jul 08, 2012 7:05 am | |
| - Daynel wrote:
- Iv121 wrote:
- With lightspeed it will take you some nice thousand years to get to the closest star so I would suggest a Jump drive ...
Actually it would just take about four years.
The closest star, Alpha Centauri, is 4.24 light years from the sun, so with the speed of light it would take 4.24 years to get there. Isn't the closest star currently Proxima Centauri, hence the name Proxima. | |
|
| | |
hyperlite
Captain
Posts : 1529
Join date : 2012-01-18
| | Subject: Re: Which Dangerous Engine????? Sun Jul 08, 2012 12:24 pm | |
| I thought it was Alpha Centari, hence the name Alpha. | |
|
| | |
torrentialAberration
Infantry
Posts : 727
Join date : 2012-06-20
Age : 111
Location : omnipresent
| | Subject: Re: Which Dangerous Engine????? Sun Jul 08, 2012 3:51 pm | |
| - hyperlite wrote:
- I thought it was Alpha Centari, hence the name Alpha.
Nope. Proxima Centauri is the star closets to Sol, then it's Alpha Centauri A and Alpha Centauri B | |
|
| | |
Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: Which Dangerous Engine????? | |
| |
|
| | |
| | Which Dangerous Engine????? | |
|
