Futurecraft Forums A forum dedicated to communication and innovation! |
Welcome, one and all, to the Futurecraft Forums! |
|
| Terran Trade Confederation | |
|
+36Instinct-XIV Emperor_Revan Captain stufuzzycat _Shadowcat_ Acu2010 Drewmanr0435 The Schmetterling Tiel+ Groot Laserbilly Commander Error Admiral Rekiin Soul of Jack torrentialAberration Caramell bobtheshoeman Julo hyperlite Eliuser12 Delta Ivan2006 Joel TinkerPox Iv121 Avenger_7 evilninjakiwi TacticalSheep5 Son of Wolves Last_Jedi_Standing superninjakiwi ACH0225 Commander Kobialka oFTWoHMANoFTWo blockman42 Hierarch Fenway Keon 40 posters | |
Author | Message |
---|
Eliuser12 Newbie
Posts : 57 Join date : 2012-07-04 Location : Under your feet... Unless you're flying.
| Subject: Re: Terran Trade Confederation Thu Jul 05, 2012 6:11 pm | |
| I really like the ships man, nice work. How long did it take to build? I'm wondering, since I was thinking of making bigger ships. (Referring to the first ship, Reconing if I'm right)
Edit:
Upon seeing the Repercussion,
PHANTOM INBOUND! | |
| | | hyperlite Captain
Posts : 1529 Join date : 2012-01-18
| Subject: Re: Terran Trade Confederation Thu Jul 05, 2012 6:23 pm | |
| Wow, I like that carrier. The amount of detail you put into that one with fighter tracks and stuff is amazing. Mine would be a big hangar crammed with a bunch of ships, no repair or landing zones | |
| | | Eliuser12 Newbie
Posts : 57 Join date : 2012-07-04 Location : Under your feet... Unless you're flying.
| Subject: Re: Terran Trade Confederation Thu Jul 05, 2012 6:30 pm | |
| So wait, both Taln Industries/Inco or whatever and TTC use a custom method of ship classifying? I thought we had a global one? | |
| | | hyperlite Captain
Posts : 1529 Join date : 2012-01-18
| Subject: Re: Terran Trade Confederation Thu Jul 05, 2012 6:34 pm | |
| Well, people argued over that so we said use whatever system you want. | |
| | | Last_Jedi_Standing Moderator
Posts : 3033 Join date : 2012-02-19 Age : 112 Location : Coruscant
| Subject: Re: Terran Trade Confederation Thu Jul 05, 2012 7:08 pm | |
| - Eliuser12 wrote:
- So wait, both Taln Industries/Inco or whatever and TTC use a custom method of ship classifying? I thought we had a global one?
Nope. We argued for ages, so now we all have our own. Mine is the best, of course. | |
| | | Tiel+ Lord/Lady Rear Admiral 1st
Posts : 5497 Join date : 2012-02-20 Age : 27 Location : AFK
| Subject: Re: Terran Trade Confederation Thu Jul 05, 2012 7:36 pm | |
| - Last_Jedi_Standing wrote:
- Eliuser12 wrote:
- So wait, both Taln Industries/Inco or whatever and TTC use a custom method of ship classifying? I thought we had a global one?
Nope. We argued for ages, so now we all have our own. Mine is the best, of course. Mine is the best. | |
| | | The Schmetterling DEV
Posts : 3123 Join date : 2011-08-31 Location : I'm a butterfly.
| Subject: Re: Terran Trade Confederation Thu Jul 05, 2012 8:07 pm | |
| - Tiel wrote:
- Last_Jedi_Standing wrote:
- Eliuser12 wrote:
- So wait, both Taln Industries/Inco or whatever and TTC use a custom method of ship classifying? I thought we had a global one?
Nope. We argued for ages, so now we all have our own. Mine is the best, of course. Mine is the best. I'd say mine is the best, but that would get us nowhere. So instead, I say Laserbilly's is the best. | |
| | | Tiel+ Lord/Lady Rear Admiral 1st
Posts : 5497 Join date : 2012-02-20 Age : 27 Location : AFK
| Subject: Re: Terran Trade Confederation Thu Jul 05, 2012 8:13 pm | |
| - Mackeroth? wrote:
- Tiel wrote:
- Last_Jedi_Standing wrote:
- Eliuser12 wrote:
- So wait, both Taln Industries/Inco or whatever and TTC use a custom method of ship classifying? I thought we had a global one?
Nope. We argued for ages, so now we all have our own. Mine is the best, of course. Mine is the best. I'd say mine is the best, but that would get us nowhere. So instead, I say Laserbilly's is the best. False humility doesn't befit the situation here, Mack. | |
| | | Laserbilly Infantry
Posts : 584 Join date : 2012-04-19
| Subject: Re: Terran Trade Confederation Thu Jul 05, 2012 8:31 pm | |
| - Tiel wrote:
- Mackeroth? wrote:
- Tiel wrote:
- Last_Jedi_Standing wrote:
- Eliuser12 wrote:
- So wait, both Taln Industries/Inco or whatever and TTC use a custom method of ship classifying? I thought we had a global one?
Nope. We argued for ages, so now we all have our own. Mine is the best, of course. Mine is the best. I'd say mine is the best, but that would get us nowhere. So instead, I say Laserbilly's is the best. False humility doesn't befit the situation here, Mack. My dad can beat up your dad! | |
| | | Tiel+ Lord/Lady Rear Admiral 1st
Posts : 5497 Join date : 2012-02-20 Age : 27 Location : AFK
| Subject: Re: Terran Trade Confederation Thu Jul 05, 2012 8:33 pm | |
| - Laserbilly wrote:
- Tiel wrote:
- Mackeroth? wrote:
- Tiel wrote:
- Last_Jedi_Standing wrote:
- Eliuser12 wrote:
- So wait, both Taln Industries/Inco or whatever and TTC use a custom method of ship classifying? I thought we had a global one?
Nope. We argued for ages, so now we all have our own. Mine is the best, of course. Mine is the best. I'd say mine is the best, but that would get us nowhere. So instead, I say Laserbilly's is the best. False humility doesn't befit the situation here, Mack. My dad can beat up your dad! I'd say my dad is the best, but that would get us nowhere. So instead, I say Last_Jedi_Standing's is the best. Doesn't really make sense in this sort of joke battle. | |
| | | Laserbilly Infantry
Posts : 584 Join date : 2012-04-19
| Subject: Re: Terran Trade Confederation Thu Jul 05, 2012 8:38 pm | |
| Retort Class Pinnace- Spoiler:
Class: Retort Type: Pinnace Dimensions: L = 25 m, W = 11 m, H = 7 m Main Weapon: One 100/10 Mark IV Mod 2 STS Rail Gun Role: Patrolling In-System, Flanking
Description: The Retort Class Pinnace is a product of the Terran Insurrection. At that time, the Terran Trade Confederation (back then, the Terran Trade Company) only had the Talon Class Pinnace. While this was sufficient for in-system defense, it left the Company fleet strongly ineffective on the offensive. This was because the Talon's irregular dimensions (35x13x9) only allowed for a maximum of 16 pinnaces to be transported to battle by one Liberty Class Freighter! To fix this, the Company comissioned Starscream Poweryahts (a Company subsidiary that usually produces high-performance poweryahts for affluent yaht-racing clubs) to design the Retort Class Pinnace. They did not disappoint. The Retort features the best small, high-performance engine that Starscream could build; which powers four, compact racing-thrusters, a small sensor suite, a one-man life support filter, and its only weapon: the Mark IV Rail Gun. All of this sheathed in a light armor carapice and still measuring only 25x11x7! Because of these dimensions, six Retorts can fit within a 25x25x25 meter carrier module, allowing for a Liberty Class Freighter to carry ninety-six Retorts to battle!
- Spoiler:
Retaliation Class Corvette- Spoiler:
Class: Retaliation Type: Corvette Dimensions: L = 91 m, W = 25 m, H = 23 m Main Weapons: Two 100/8 Mark II Mod 0 STS Guns Secondary Weapons: Eight 50/5 Mark III Mod 1 AA Guns Role: Patrolling, Light Escort, Flank Protection
Description: The first warship of the Terran Trade Confederation, the Retaliation is a product of The Fall. In the opening years of The Fall, when the Imperial fleets began withdrawing from the Outer Systems and piracy was on the rise, the Terran Trade Company decided to stop relying on infrequent Imperial patrols take measures to defend itself. The pirates, allows a problem for the “less important” outlying provinces, were becoming bolder with each year. They had begun building small flotillas of fighters and pinnaces and then started waylaying whole convoys of unprotected trade ships!
This had to stop. In response to both the increased attacks and the Empire’s refusal to make any decisive reply, the Terran Trade Company decided to build a warship capable of defending its convoys. That ship was the Retaliation class corvette. It was not very remarkable, having eight 50/5 Mark III Mod 1 anti-air guns for dealing with the pirate fighters and pinnaces and only two 100/8 Mark II Mod 0 ship-to-ship guns for anything larger. It also had light armor and a modest shield emitter. What was astonishing about this ship was that it was the first non-Imperial warship to dare to include an FTL drive!
This was a risky move, because up until then, the Imperial Fleet was the sole protector within the borders of the Empire and no one knew how it would react to such a large entity as the Company building warships. Luckily for the Company, the short-sighted Empire just reacted by placing a tariff on all imported cargo into the receding Imperial territory. This allowed the Company to make a killing, despite the tariff, as it expanded its newly protected trading fleets into territory that had been abandoned by smaller, unprotected trading companies! The Retaliation is one of the pinnacle ships that helped make TTC what it is today!
- Spoiler:
Last edited by Laserbilly on Sun Dec 02, 2012 10:28 pm; edited 1 time in total | |
| | | Tiel+ Lord/Lady Rear Admiral 1st
Posts : 5497 Join date : 2012-02-20 Age : 27 Location : AFK
| Subject: Re: Terran Trade Confederation Thu Jul 05, 2012 8:42 pm | |
| All day?
That's one of two posts I made today in response to mack. I wouldn't consider that 'dogging', I've been striving not to do that after LJS said we were both being immature. | |
| | | Laserbilly Infantry
Posts : 584 Join date : 2012-04-19
| Subject: Re: Terran Trade Confederation Thu Jul 05, 2012 8:54 pm | |
| - Tiel wrote:
- All day?
That's one of two posts I made today in response to mack. I wouldn't consider that 'dogging', I've been striving not to do that after LJS said we were both being immature. Well, maybe I'm just behind on what's been going on in the off topic section, but I just read a whole thread in there with you two going at it with each other. I was just wondering if he had done something specific to piss you off or you were just generally sick of him? I mean, we all know he can be a condescending prick sometimes, but I'm pretty sure that's just him play-acting for the rest of the forum. Since he made that public statement a month or so ago, I feel like his ego has been under control and that he's been trying to give good advice to the new posters. Also, I haven't seen him post any of his ships on other people's threads in while, either. (let me know if I went too far with this, Mack) | |
| | | Tiel+ Lord/Lady Rear Admiral 1st
Posts : 5497 Join date : 2012-02-20 Age : 27 Location : AFK
| Subject: Re: Terran Trade Confederation Thu Jul 05, 2012 9:04 pm | |
| - Laserbilly wrote:
- Tiel wrote:
- All day?
That's one of two posts I made today in response to mack. I wouldn't consider that 'dogging', I've been striving not to do that after LJS said we were both being immature. Well, maybe I'm just behind on what's been going on in the off topic section, but I just read a whole thread in there with you two going at it with each other. I was just wondering if he had done something specific to piss you off or you were just generally sick of him?
I mean, we all know he can be a condescending prick sometimes, but I'm pretty sure that's just him play-acting for the rest of the forum. Since he made that public statement a month or so ago, I feel like his ego has been under control and that he's been trying to give good advice to the new posters. Also, I haven't seen him post any of his ships on other people's threads in while, either. Well, no. If he's just play-acting as you say he certainly must be enjoying it to the point of being 'Mackeroth' again. To be frank, I doubt he ever left that persona behind. If you can find any good advice in the last, say, 14 days, I'll bet you I can find twice as many articles, if not more, containing the opposite. I'll just have to relearn how to tolerate Mack for the sake of maintaining equilibrium. | |
| | | Laserbilly Infantry
Posts : 584 Join date : 2012-04-19
| Subject: Re: Terran Trade Confederation Thu Jul 05, 2012 9:39 pm | |
| New Retaliation description/TTC lore added! - Spoiler:
Description: The first warship of the Terran Trade Confederation, the Retaliation is a product of The Fall. In the opening years of The Fall, when the Imperial fleets began withdrawing from the Outer Systems and piracy was on the rise, the Terran Trade Company decided to stop relying on infrequent Imperial patrols take measures to defend itself. The pirates, allows a problem for the “less important” outlying provinces, were becoming bolder with each year. They had begun building small flotillas of fighters and pinnaces and then started waylaying whole convoys of unprotected trade ships!
This had to stop. In response to both the increased attacks and the Empire’s refusal to make any decisive reply, the Terran Trade Company decided to build a warship capable of defending its convoys. That ship was the Retaliation class corvette. It was not very remarkable, having eight 50/5 Mark III Mod 1 anti-air guns for dealing with the pirate fighters and pinnaces and only two 100/8 Mark II Mod 0 ship-to-ship guns for anything larger. It also had light armor and a modest shield emitter. What was astonishing about this ship was that it was the first non-Imperial warship to dare to include an FTL drive!
This was a risky move, because up until then, the Imperial Fleet was the sole protector within the borders of the Empire and no one knew how it would react to such a large entity as the Company building warships. Luckily for the Company, the short-sighted Empire just reacted by placing a tariff on all imported cargo into the receding Imperial territory. This allowed the Company to make a killing, despite the tariff, as it expanded its newly protected trading fleets into territory that had been abandoned by smaller, unprotected trading companies! The Retaliation is one of the pinnacle ships that helped make TTC what it is today!
| |
| | | Eliuser12 Newbie
Posts : 57 Join date : 2012-07-04 Location : Under your feet... Unless you're flying.
| Subject: Re: Terran Trade Confederation Thu Jul 05, 2012 9:44 pm | |
| - Tiel wrote:
- Laserbilly wrote:
- Tiel wrote:
- All day?
That's one of two posts I made today in response to mack. I wouldn't consider that 'dogging', I've been striving not to do that after LJS said we were both being immature. Well, maybe I'm just behind on what's been going on in the off topic section, but I just read a whole thread in there with you two going at it with each other. I was just wondering if he had done something specific to piss you off or you were just generally sick of him?
I mean, we all know he can be a condescending prick sometimes, but I'm pretty sure that's just him play-acting for the rest of the forum. Since he made that public statement a month or so ago, I feel like his ego has been under control and that he's been trying to give good advice to the new posters. Also, I haven't seen him post any of his ships on other people's threads in while, either. Well, no. If he's just play-acting as you say he certainly must be enjoying it to the point of being 'Mackeroth' again. To be frank, I doubt he ever left that persona behind. If you can find any good advice in the last, say, 14 days, I'll bet you I can find twice as many articles, if not more, containing the opposite. I'll just have to relearn how to tolerate Mack for the sake of maintaining equilibrium. I'd say my dad's better, but that's just not true. So Instead, I say my mom is better! | |
| | | Laserbilly Infantry
Posts : 584 Join date : 2012-04-19
| Subject: Re: Terran Trade Confederation Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:52 pm | |
| New Reprisal Description/TTC Lore added too! - Spoiler:
Description: The second warship to be commissioned by the Terran Trade Confederation (then the Terran Trade Company), the Reprisal is a well-rounded light destroyer. The circumstances of its commission are well known. The Fall was well into its middle stages, the Imperial Fleet had completely abandoned all but Central Systems, and pirates had become bolder than ever. Somehow, a few larger pirate bands had cobbled together a few light cruisers, and even more astonishing, had gotten a hold of several decommissioned Imperial frigates [many historians believe that these came from corrupt officials and officers who were discreetly funding the pirates for a hefty cut of their profits],and had begun terrorizing the now insufficiently protected trading convoys of the TTC and other companies like it.
The Company was then faced with a complicated problem, on one hand, the Empire both refused to protect their convoys and restricted the size of non-Imperial warships, and on the other, both the Empire and the TTC relied on the steady inflow of trade goods from the Outer Systems. The Company needed a ship that could fight off older (but larger) ships and still be within the Empire’s size restrictions. The result was the original Reprisal class light destroyer. It had two ship-to-ship guns and a small, fixed MAC cannon for dealing with the older decommissioned frigates, and was nimble enough to outmanuaver slower, yet more heavily armed heaps that the pirates claimed were battleships but were more accurately classified as small light cruisers.
It was the perfect ship for the restrictions set for it, however, in spite of the success of the Reprisal {or more likely because of it] many key officials within the Empire [the same ones who would lose on their investments in the pirates] urged the Emperor to penalize the TTC for “building a fleet to threaten the Empire.” The Emperor leveled a new, impossibly high, tariff on all Terran trade. When the Terrans were unable to pay, the Empire sent a fleet to occupy the Terran homeworld. This, of course set led to the Terran Insurrection and, eventually, the Terran Trade Confederation.
While the Reprisal class light destroyer has received many refits over the years since its first commission, it has remained a staple of Terran power and protection.
| |
| | | Tiel+ Lord/Lady Rear Admiral 1st
Posts : 5497 Join date : 2012-02-20 Age : 27 Location : AFK
| Subject: Re: Terran Trade Confederation Thu Jul 05, 2012 11:06 pm | |
| - Laserbilly wrote:
- New Reprisal Description/TTC Lore added too!
- Spoiler:
Description: The second warship to be commissioned by the Terran Trade Confederation (then the Terran Trade Company), the Reprisal is a well-rounded light destroyer. The circumstances of its commission are well known. The Fall was well into its middle stages, the Imperial Fleet had completely abandoned all but Central Systems, and pirates had become bolder than ever. Somehow, a few larger pirate bands had cobbled together a few light cruisers, and even more astonishing, had gotten a hold of several decommissioned Imperial frigates [many historians believe that these came from corrupt officials and officers who were discreetly funding the pirates for a hefty cut of their profits],and had begun terrorizing the now insufficiently protected trading convoys of the TTC and other companies like it.
The Company was then faced with a complicated problem, on one hand, the Empire both refused to protect their convoys and restricted the size of non-Imperial warships, and on the other, both the Empire and the TTC relied on the steady inflow of trade goods from the Outer Systems. The Company needed a ship that could fight off older (but larger) ships and still be within the Empire’s size restrictions. The result was the original Reprisal class light destroyer. It had two ship-to-ship guns and a small, fixed MAC cannon for dealing with the older decommissioned frigates, and was nimble enough to outmanuaver slower, yet more heavily armed heaps that the pirates claimed were battleships but were more accurately classified as small light cruisers.
It was the perfect ship for the restrictions set for it, however, in spite of the success of the Reprisal {or more likely because of it] many key officials within the Empire [the same ones who would lose on their investments in the pirates] urged the Emperor to penalize the TTC for “building a fleet to threaten the Empire.” The Emperor leveled a new, impossibly high, tariff on all Terran trade. When the Terrans were unable to pay, the Empire sent a fleet to occupy the Terran homeworld. This, of course set led to the Terran Insurrection and, eventually, the Terran Trade Confederation.
While the Reprisal class light destroyer has received many refits over the years since its first commission, it has remained a staple of Terran power and protection.
This is good stuff. | |
| | | hyperlite Captain
Posts : 1529 Join date : 2012-01-18
| Subject: Re: Terran Trade Confederation Thu Jul 05, 2012 11:18 pm | |
| Can you put a world download for the carrier I do not understand it from the pictures, like where the front is and the hangars. Thanks. | |
| | | The Schmetterling DEV
Posts : 3123 Join date : 2011-08-31 Location : I'm a butterfly.
| Subject: Re: Terran Trade Confederation Fri Jul 06, 2012 3:34 am | |
| - Tiel wrote:
- Laserbilly wrote:
- Tiel wrote:
- Mackeroth? wrote:
- Tiel wrote:
- Last_Jedi_Standing wrote:
- Eliuser12 wrote:
- So wait, both Taln Industries/Inco or whatever and TTC use a custom method of ship classifying? I thought we had a global one?
Nope. We argued for ages, so now we all have our own. Mine is the best, of course. Mine is the best. I'd say mine is the best, but that would get us nowhere. So instead, I say Laserbilly's is the best. False humility doesn't befit the situation here, Mack. My dad can beat up your dad! I'd say my dad is the best, but that would get us nowhere. So instead, I say Last_Jedi_Standing's is the best.
Doesn't really make sense in this sort of joke battle. No, that was my genuine opinion: Laserbilly has his awesome size-comparison chart and blueprint charts. That makes his classifications better than everyone else's. If I had that idea originally, and implemented it, then indeed I would've said my classification was better. | |
| | | Tiel+ Lord/Lady Rear Admiral 1st
Posts : 5497 Join date : 2012-02-20 Age : 27 Location : AFK
| Subject: Re: Terran Trade Confederation Fri Jul 06, 2012 3:35 am | |
| I'll take your word for it. | |
| | | The Schmetterling DEV
Posts : 3123 Join date : 2011-08-31 Location : I'm a butterfly.
| Subject: Re: Terran Trade Confederation Fri Jul 06, 2012 3:38 am | |
| - Laserbilly wrote:
- Tiel wrote:
- All day?
That's one of two posts I made today in response to mack. I wouldn't consider that 'dogging', I've been striving not to do that after LJS said we were both being immature. Well, maybe I'm just behind on what's been going on in the off topic section, but I just read a whole thread in there with you two going at it with each other. I was just wondering if he had done something specific to piss you off or you were just generally sick of him?
I mean, we all know he can be a condescending prick sometimes, but I'm pretty sure that's just him play-acting for the rest of the forum. Since he made that public statement a month or so ago, I feel like his ego has been under control and that he's been trying to give good advice to the new posters. Also, I haven't seen him post any of his ships on other people's threads in while, either. (let me know if I went too far with this, Mack) I only ever did that twice. And I WAS trying to be helpful. I just wasn't being very polite in the interim. | |
| | | Eliuser12 Newbie
Posts : 57 Join date : 2012-07-04 Location : Under your feet... Unless you're flying.
| Subject: Re: Terran Trade Confederation Fri Jul 06, 2012 7:46 pm | |
| I'm just posting to get rid of the necro feel. Enjoy. | |
| | | Laserbilly Infantry
Posts : 584 Join date : 2012-04-19
| Subject: Re: Terran Trade Confederation Fri Jul 06, 2012 8:24 pm | |
| I have finally gotten a Dropbox account and have uploaded all my larger MCE schematics to it. I might make the links public later, but for the moment, if one of you wants a schematic, just PM me the request and I'll get back to you. | |
| | | Laserbilly Infantry
Posts : 584 Join date : 2012-04-19
| Subject: Re: Terran Trade Confederation Sat Jul 07, 2012 5:24 pm | |
| Here's a little teaser of the TTC's next ship. I'll add some more photos for the Repercussion and this new one soon. - Spoiler:
| |
| | | Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Terran Trade Confederation | |
| |
| | | | Terran Trade Confederation | |
|
Similar topics | |
|
| Permissions in this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| |
|