| | Halo 4 good or bad? |  |
|
+5Ivan2006 hyperlite Last_Jedi_Standing torrentialAberration Emperor_Revan 9 posters |
| is halo 4 good or bad? | | it was amazing! | | 6% | [ 2 ] | | it was great! | | 12% | [ 4 ] | | it was ok | | 12% | [ 4 ] | | it was decent | | 12% | [ 4 ] | | it wasn't good | | 9% | [ 3 ] | | it was horrible | | 9% | [ 3 ] | | it doesn't even deserve to be in the halo franchise | | 15% | [ 5 ] | | i cant even believe i wasted time on this game | | 9% | [ 3 ] | | other (post please) | | 18% | [ 6 ] |
| | Total Votes : 34 | | | | Poll closed |
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
Emperor_Revan
Recruit
Posts : 249
Join date : 2012-03-31
Age : 111
Location : Aboard the Dov-Class Super Star Destroyer Glories Wake
| Subject: Halo 4 good or bad?  Thu Nov 08, 2012 6:51 pm | |
| well, i just got done playing the whole game, and experienced all of it, within 5-6 hours.
Also, i found there was no equivalent to forge world from halo reach in the game, and there are no Aerial vehicles for the UNSC except in campaign
ignore the the halo reach on the poll
Last edited by Emperor_Revan on Thu Nov 08, 2012 7:02 pm; edited 1 time in total | |
|
| | |
Tiel+
Lord/Lady Rear Admiral 1st
Posts : 5497
Join date : 2012-02-20
Age : 26
Location : AFK
| | Subject: Re: Halo 4 good or bad? Thu Nov 08, 2012 6:53 pm | |
| There is a topic for Halo 4 in this very subforum, did you not see it?
Your poll is also apparently for Halo Reach, not 4. | |
|
| | |
Emperor_Revan
Recruit
Posts : 249
Join date : 2012-03-31
Age : 111
Location : Aboard the Dov-Class Super Star Destroyer Glories Wake
| | Subject: Re: Halo 4 good or bad? Thu Nov 08, 2012 6:57 pm | |
| - Tiel wrote:
- There is a topic for Halo 4 in this very subforum, did you not see it?
Your poll is also apparently for Halo Reach, not 4. Tiel, i cant even believe you actually went and edited it to say that. also, this is for if people think it is good or bad, and the other thread is outdated and for getting it | |
|
| | |
Tiel+
Lord/Lady Rear Admiral 1st
Posts : 5497
Join date : 2012-02-20
Age : 26
Location : AFK
| | Subject: Re: Halo 4 good or bad? Thu Nov 08, 2012 7:00 pm | |
| Nice try, but I only have moderator powers in the judiciary section.
A Halo 4 thread is a Halo 4 thread. We don't need two, much less three. But since I have nothing contributive to add to this topic I'll leave it at that. | |
|
| | |
torrentialAberration
Infantry
Posts : 727
Join date : 2012-06-20
Age : 111
Location : omnipresent
| | Subject: Re: Halo 4 good or bad? Thu Nov 08, 2012 7:41 pm | |
| WARNING: ACTUAL SPOILERS- Spoiler:
I think they took it in the wrong direction, making the campaign not Halo-y enough and leaving a virtual goldmine untouched. The untapped resource I speak of is the covenant loyalists and post-Schism separatist governments, as well as the sate of the humans. There could have been a large section of campaign devoted to these, lengthening the campaign, adding to lore, setting up more of a foundation for the game, and generally making it better. The main antagonist was too simplistic and contained practically none of the Didact from Cryptum an Primordium, which is disappointing.
| |
|
| | |
Last_Jedi_Standing
Moderator
Posts : 3033
Join date : 2012-02-19
Age : 111
Location : Coruscant
| | Subject: Re: Halo 4 good or bad? Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:22 pm | |
| - Emperor_Revan wrote:
- there are no Aerial vehicles for the UNSC except in campaign
Why is that a problem? | |
|
| | |
Emperor_Revan
Recruit
Posts : 249
Join date : 2012-03-31
Age : 111
Location : Aboard the Dov-Class Super Star Destroyer Glories Wake
| | Subject: Re: Halo 4 good or bad? Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:34 pm | |
| - Last_Jedi_Standing wrote:
- Emperor_Revan wrote:
- there are no Aerial vehicles for the UNSC except in campaign
Why is that a problem? they had a chance to finally give people the pelican fully, and you only get to use it once. im pretty sure everyone has dreamed of flying a pelican around forge world once or twice | |
|
| | |
torrentialAberration
Infantry
Posts : 727
Join date : 2012-06-20
Age : 111
Location : omnipresent
| | Subject: Re: Halo 4 good or bad? Thu Nov 08, 2012 11:02 pm | |
| - Emperor_Revan wrote:
- Last_Jedi_Standing wrote:
- Emperor_Revan wrote:
- there are no Aerial vehicles for the UNSC except in campaign
Why is that a problem?
they had a chance to finally give people the pelican fully, and you only get to use it once. im pretty sure everyone has dreamed of flying a pelican around forge world once or twice I was really hoping they would put the pelican in forge and multiplayer, using it only once briefly in campaign is just a bit stupid. I've wondered why they didn't put the Hornet back (in Reach and 4). It makes more sense to me than the Falcon. | |
|
| | |
Last_Jedi_Standing
Moderator
Posts : 3033
Join date : 2012-02-19
Age : 111
Location : Coruscant
| | Subject: Re: Halo 4 good or bad? Thu Nov 08, 2012 11:31 pm | |
| The poll seems conflicted, but overall it's good enough that I'll buy it in a couple of years when it's cheap and no-one cares anymore. | |
|
| | |
Emperor_Revan
Recruit
Posts : 249
Join date : 2012-03-31
Age : 111
Location : Aboard the Dov-Class Super Star Destroyer Glories Wake
| | Subject: Re: Halo 4 good or bad? Fri Nov 09, 2012 12:05 am | |
| - catsonmeth wrote:
- Emperor_Revan wrote:
- Last_Jedi_Standing wrote:
- Emperor_Revan wrote:
- there are no Aerial vehicles for the UNSC except in campaign
Why is that a problem?
they had a chance to finally give people the pelican fully, and you only get to use it once. im pretty sure everyone has dreamed of flying a pelican around forge world once or twice
I was really hoping they would put the pelican in forge and multiplayer, using it only once briefly in campaign is just a bit stupid. I've wondered why they didn't put the Hornet back (in Reach and 4). It makes more sense to me than the Falcon. I will say that it would be impossible for the pelican to be practical in forge mode, seeing as they made all the maps very small. though they should had at least had the hornet | |
|
| | |
ACH0225
General
Posts : 2346
Join date : 2012-01-01
Location : I might be somewhere, I might not.
| | Subject: Re: Halo 4 good or bad? Fri Nov 09, 2012 12:49 am | |
| I am unkillable the exact pictosecond I touch a railgun. I out sniped a guy with a binary rifle with it. This, however, only lasts until I am out of munitions. | |
|
| | |
hyperlite
Captain
Posts : 1529
Join date : 2012-01-18
| | Subject: Re: Halo 4 good or bad? Sat Nov 10, 2012 7:51 pm | |
| - catsonmeth wrote:
- WARNING: ACTUAL SPOILERS
- Spoiler:
I think they took it in the wrong direction, making the campaign not Halo-y enough and leaving a virtual goldmine untouched. The untapped resource I speak of is the covenant loyalists and post-Schism separatist governments, as well as the sate of the humans. There could have been a large section of campaign devoted to these, lengthening the campaign, adding to lore, setting up more of a foundation for the game, and generally making it better. The main antagonist was too simplistic and contained practically none of the Didact from Cryptum an Primordium, which is disappointing.
Response to actual spoilers- Spoiler:
I agree with you exactly. I also don't like fighting the forerunner as much as the Covenant. It did not seem very Halo at all. If they went down the road with a crazy separatist leader and he was attacking the Elite home world of Sangheili that would be awesome. It was still cool how in the last level how you can see earth. Also the music in the game is very good. The CGI they did was phenomenal, I thought Doctor Halsey was a real actor in the first long cut scene.
| |
|
| | |
Ivan2006
General
Posts : 2096
Join date : 2012-05-08
Age : 26
Location : The Dungeon.
| | Subject: Re: Halo 4 good or bad? Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:35 am | |
| You completely forgot to have a "I didn´t even play the game"-choice. | |
|
| | |
Groot
Marine
Posts : 1456
Join date : 2012-03-18
Age : 27
Location : Yggdrasil
| | Subject: Re: Halo 4 good or bad? Sun Nov 11, 2012 9:22 am | |
| Contrary to what I said on the other halo thread, I have actually played halo 4, all I can say it that the graphics are amazing, but that's about it, multiplayer is more like what I would expect from CoD, and it just lacks, well, I don't know but it just isn't as fun as bungie halo, the graphics are amazing, but that's it.
Not bad, but not great either, too much time wasted on improving graphics instead of working on gameplay.
Bring back Bungie, they knew how to make a good halo. | |
|
| | |
ACH0225
General
Posts : 2346
Join date : 2012-01-01
Location : I might be somewhere, I might not.
| | Subject: Re: Halo 4 good or bad? Sun Nov 11, 2012 9:34 am | |
| But a bunch of the developer-caste went from Bungie to 343... | |
|
| | |
Tiel+
Lord/Lady Rear Admiral 1st
Posts : 5497
Join date : 2012-02-20
Age : 26
Location : AFK
| | Subject: Re: Halo 4 good or bad? Sun Nov 11, 2012 9:39 am | |
| - ACH0225 wrote:
- But a bunch of the developer-caste went from Bungie to 343...
Exaggeration. 343 existed long before Bungie quit, probably only three or so guys transferred to it after their company left. Even then, I doubt 343 would have listened to the Bungie guys telling them how to make a game..commercial development on this scale simply doesn't work that way. | |
|
| | |
Avenger_7
Sergeant
Posts : 906
Join date : 2012-02-10
Location : Flying my logic bomber.
| | Subject: Re: Halo 4 good or bad? Sun Nov 11, 2012 5:03 pm | |
| - Tiel wrote:
- ACH0225 wrote:
- But a bunch of the developer-caste went from Bungie to 343...
Exaggeration. 343 existed long before Bungie quit, probably only three or so guys transferred to it after their company left. Even then, I doubt 343 would have listened to the Bungie guys telling them how to make a game..commercial development on this scale simply doesn't work that way. A lot of the people who transferred there are actually the lead developers. So the Bungie guys are, in fact, telling them how to make the game. | |
|
| | |
Tiel+
Lord/Lady Rear Admiral 1st
Posts : 5497
Join date : 2012-02-20
Age : 26
Location : AFK
| | Subject: Re: Halo 4 good or bad? Sun Nov 11, 2012 5:28 pm | |
| | |
|
| | |
torrentialAberration
Infantry
Posts : 727
Join date : 2012-06-20
Age : 111
Location : omnipresent
| | Subject: Re: Halo 4 good or bad? Sun Nov 11, 2012 5:43 pm | |
| - hyperlite wrote:
- catsonmeth wrote:
- WARNING: ACTUAL SPOILERS
- Spoiler:
I think they took it in the wrong direction, making the campaign not Halo-y enough and leaving a virtual goldmine untouched. The untapped resource I speak of is the covenant loyalists and post-Schism separatist governments, as well as the sate of the humans. There could have been a large section of campaign devoted to these, lengthening the campaign, adding to lore, setting up more of a foundation for the game, and generally making it better. The main antagonist was too simplistic and contained practically none of the Didact from Cryptum an Primordium, which is disappointing.
Response to actual spoilers
- Spoiler:
I agree with you exactly. I also don't like fighting the forerunner as much as the Covenant. It did not seem very Halo at all. If they went down the road with a crazy separatist leader and he was attacking the Elite home world of Sangheili that would be awesome. It was still cool how in the last level how you can see earth. Also the music in the game is very good. The CGI they did was phenomenal, I thought Doctor Halsey was a real actor in the first long cut scene.
It should've started out as you playing as an ODST or Spartan IV hunter-killer working with the Sangheili to to hunt down the last of the loyalists. You find that the loyalist's strength and numbers are growing and they start belching stuff about the forerunners returning. Then more stuff happens. | |
|
| | |
Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: Halo 4 good or bad? | |
| |
|
| | |
| | Halo 4 good or bad? | |
|
