Which would you choose?

Luna wrote:

Fleet Admiral Error wrote:

Sorry, Daynel typo there. You're not (completely) immoral. Just immortal.

And FENWAY! If/When Mercury's EE dies, get this RP'd up!

Please?

  
Do I get credit?

For the RP idea or for not going power-mad? Both, if you want

It looks like the RP just died... intentional or not. Or should we wait? I'll star writing something up and maybe i'll send it to Cats or Fenway to see if they approve (not sure how well my writing skills will hold up)

Luna wrote:

It looks like the RP just died... intentional or not. Or should we wait? I'll star writing something up and maybe i'll send it to Cats or Fenway to see if they approve (not sure how well my writing skills will hold up)

I don't think we should wait.

Overall theme (other than the obvious), time period...?

EDIT: Remember a while ago when we were talking about using Google Docs for real-time fleet battles? I think we should try and apply that here.

Tau wrote:

I don't think we should wait.

Overall theme (other than the obvious), time period...?

EDIT: Remember a while ago when we were talking about using Google Docs for real-time fleet battles? I think we should try and apply that here.

Cat's and I are discussing it now, also I think this is a first person RP.

Alright, unless there are any objections, I'm going to go ahead and kill my Equivalent Exchange RP, it's already slowing, anyway. (Might pick it up latter, maybe structured a little better.

So I can write an RP for this. However, I actually had a different idea for an RP earlier today.

It's kind of like Tron, except not Disney, nor 80s. Did anyone see that movie where people played this game for money and it was kind of neuro-link VR and they had to not die or else they die it real life? Or something like that I never really paid attention to it when I watched it. Well it's kind of like that. It would be like the people are selected to play this game. The game would be entirely player-centric, they have the abilities to destroy and create, sometimes that ability is used against them by the game. Like a lucid dream, where you think about one of your fears and it appears.

With this gods RP, I would make it present or near-future, the players must choose a god. There would be factions and such, but enmity and alliances would be relative. For instance, Ur and Long Man are both neutral(ish) but they directly contradict each other. Amlia could be allied with either of these (but would have a stronger attraction toward Long Man). Also, a relationship mechanic could be implemented that allows the god's powers to merge or something, which gives a disadvantage to Lux and Lokt's taboos.

Or I could do a mash-up of both of these.

Suggestions and votes for either are appreciated.

MercurySteam wrote:

I would make it present or near-future,

Agreed.

MercurySteam wrote:

...the players must choose a god.

Doesn't sound ideal to me, but it would be hard to work Markedness into the RP, so it's necessary.

MercurySteam wrote:

There would be factions and such, but enmity and alliances would be relative. For instance, Ur and Long Man are both neutral(ish) but they directly contradict each other. Amlia could be allied with either of these (but would have a stronger attraction toward Long Man). Also, a relationship mechanic could be implemented that allows the god's powers to merge or something, which gives a disadvantage to Lux and Lokt's taboos.

...I have no idea what to think about this. But go ahead, I guess.

Guys, it's just a lawful-chaotic good-evil spectrum. Seriously.

Anyways, the amount of evil people on the forum is creepy.

Keon wrote:

Guys, it's just a lawful-chaotic good-evil spectrum. Seriously.

Anyways, the amount of evil people on the forum is creepy.

you try putting the individual gods together in boxes, it's impossible with the way it was thought out.

Keon wrote:

Guys, it's just a lawful-chaotic good-evil spectrum. Seriously.

Anyways, the amount of evil people on the forum is creepy.

Hey, I chose the tentacle god. That one can't be evil, it didn't even state what it wanted from me! Dark powers without taboos or commitment! How can that be evil?

Daynel wrote:

Hey, I chose the tentacle god. That one can't be evil, it didn't even state what it wanted from me! Dark powers without taboos or commitment! How can that be evil?

I'll allow you to think over what you just wrote then ask that again.

Fleet Admiral Error wrote:

Daynel wrote:

Hey, I chose the tentacle god. That one can't be evil, it didn't even state what it wanted from me! Dark powers without taboos or commitment! How can that be evil?

I'll allow you to think over what you just wrote then ask that again.

Actually Cat's and I discussed this, Xm isn't inherently evil, for all we know he has good intent, it's just the powers that have negative effects.

Luna wrote:

Actually Cat's and I discussed this, Xm isn't inherently evil, for all we know he has good intent, it's just the powers that have negative effects.

Yes, but he said

Daynel wrote:

How can that be evil?

I can think of lots of ways that he COULD be evil.

Fleet Admiral Error wrote:

Luna wrote:

Actually Cat's and I discussed this, Xm isn't inherently evil, for all we know he has good intent, it's just the powers that have negative effects.

Yes, but he said

Daynel wrote:

How can that be evil?

I can think of lots of ways that he COULD be evil.

Oh, ok that's a different story.

XM is actually Cthulu, the tentacles prove this.

Luna wrote:

Fleet Admiral Error wrote:

Luna wrote:

Actually Cat's and I discussed this, Xm isn't inherently evil, for all we know he has good intent, it's just the powers that have negative effects.

Yes, but he said

Daynel wrote:

How can that be evil?

I can think of lots of ways that he COULD be evil.

Oh, ok that's a different story.

Also sarcasm. XM is, like, the 3rd or 2nd most evil one.

Prototype wrote:

Solar112 wrote:

I am not power mad! well... maybe a little... And @ Daynel, Lokt doesn't seem inherently evil, that would be Quet.

Lokt basically asks you to be a dictator.

How is that bad?

Heil Solar!

Tiel+ wrote:

Heil Solar!

While that's accurate for my name, I like the sound of Sonne better.

Solar112 wrote:

Tiel+ wrote:

Heil Solar!

While that's accurate for my name, I like the sound of Sonne better.

You're still an ars(ln).

Vinyl wrote:

Solar112 wrote:

Tiel+ wrote:

Heil Solar!

While that's accurate for my name, I like the sound of Sonne better.

You're still an ars(ln).

Wouldn't you take the natural log of ars, not the reverse?

Do I smell a political discussion? I just finished writing a poly sci paper on the failure we call democracy, I'm ready.

I can prove that in 3 words:

It's from /b/



Also, what you just said was a sin, stop going off on tangents.

Keon wrote:

LeEpicMemester wrote:

Do I smell a political discussion? I just finished writing a poly sci paper on the failure we call democracy, I'm ready.

I was trying to lead it in the discussion of obscure math jokes, but sure. Give me a few hours, I'll write a paper on why each god is a horrible god.

Don't turn this into a maths debate

LeEpicMemester wrote:

Also, what you just said was a sin, stop going off on tangents.

He meant the gods in the OP, which is a hypothetical discussion.
The christian god can not properly argued about, as people still can't agree on what his values are.