Bill Clinton's administration was and the French are/were steaming piles of crap.

"The United Nations Assistance Mission for Rwanda (UNAMIR) was hampered from the outset by resistance from numerous UN Security Council members, who were reluctant to have the UN become involved. As Philip Gourevitch puts it, "The Clinton administration's policy was, "Let's withdraw altogether. Let's get out of Rwanda. Leave it to its fate." The United States ambassador to the United Nations at that time was then Madeline Albright. And it was she who was in the position of having to represent this position to the Security Council, and who did so very effectively."[80] This applied both to the Arusha Accords process and to preventing or suppressing the genocide.[80][81] Only Belgium had asked for a strong UNAMIR mandate. After the murder of ten Belgian peacekeepers protecting the Prime Minister in early April and the failure of the Security Council to act, Belgium pulled out of the peacekeeping mission.[82]"

"The US was reluctant to get involved in the "local conflict" in Rwanda and refused to label the killings as "genocide". Then-president Bill Clinton later publicly regretted that decision in a Frontline television interview. Five years later, Clinton stated that he believed that if he had sent 5,000 U.S. peacekeepers, more than 500,000 lives could have been saved.[89]"


I hated him before, but this guy need to be boiled in acid for eternity. And probably will be.

Edit: "The UN also requested 50 armoured personnel carriers from the United States; the US Army charged $6.5 million (USD) for transport alone. Deployment was delayed due to arguments over their cost and other factors.[92]"

Gott strafe amerika.

OK, this is too far. You can hate on faceless organizations and corporations all you want, but singling out any sole person or group as a target for disdain is just crossing the line. Show some tact, this isn't your generic-brand 4chan.

Tiel+ wrote:

OK, this is too far. You can hate on faceless organizations and corporations all you want, but singling out any sole person or group as a target for disdain is just crossing the line. Show some tact, this isn't your generic-brand 4chan.

Calling Bill Clinton crap for letting children be hacked to death is bad? ok.

DaveMustaine wrote:

Tiel+ wrote:

OK, this is too far. You can hate on faceless organizations and corporations all you want, but singling out any sole person or group as a target for disdain is just crossing the line. Show some tact, this isn't your generic-brand 4chan.

Calling Bill Clinton crap for letting children be hacked to death is bad? ok.

You do realise he doesn't make the decisions himself, any des icons have to be approved by others.

Seriously, just because someone is a figurehead doesn't mean they are the ones actually doing stuff.

Prototype wrote:

DaveMustaine wrote:

Tiel+ wrote:

OK, this is too far. You can hate on faceless organizations and corporations all you want, but singling out any sole person or group as a target for disdain is just crossing the line. Show some tact, this isn't your generic-brand 4chan.

Calling Bill Clinton crap for letting children be hacked to death is bad? ok.

You do realise he doesn't make the decisions himself, any des icons have to be approved by others.

Seriously, just because someone is a figurehead doesn't mean they are the ones actually doing stuff.

He knew what was going on, and could have helped. And there's also the "I did not cheat on my wife" thing. Also screw the UN, they're pathetic.

DaveMustaine wrote:

Tiel+ wrote:

OK, this is too far. You can hate on faceless organizations and corporations all you want, but singling out any sole person or group as a target for disdain is just crossing the line. Show some tact, this isn't your generic-brand 4chan.

Calling Bill Clinton crap for letting children be hacked to death is bad? ok.

Calling anyone crap is not the pretext to a discussion that's going to go anywhere good. Surely you can see that.

Tiel+ wrote:

DaveMustaine wrote:

Tiel+ wrote:

OK, this is too far. You can hate on faceless organizations and corporations all you want, but singling out any sole person or group as a target for disdain is just crossing the line. Show some tact, this isn't your generic-brand 4chan.

Calling Bill Clinton crap for letting children be hacked to death is bad? ok.

Calling anyone crap is not the pretext to a discussion that's going to go anywhere good. Surely you can see that.

Discussions on the internet never lead anywhere good, that's probably a rule. But I'll change the title.

Moment of silence has been had.

LIBERTARIAN PARTY 2016

The French. Ha.

Tau I want you to stop advertising the Libertarian party in every effin post you make, especially when it has NOTHING to do with the subject.

Robotnik wrote:

Tau I want you to stop advertising the Libertarian party in every effin post you make, especially when it has NOTHING to do with the subject.

Evidently you are unfamiliar with the concept of a joke. The joke here being my deranged overhyping of the party as the solution to all the world's problems, when it most evidently is not.

I'll stop.

i'm so sorry

CMA's trollin'

Everyone's hatin'

Rollin', patrolin' tryna point out his shit arguments.

From now on, MercurySteam is required to freestyle all his posts.

To be honest in this very second children in Africa are probably murdered, they are in a constant state of war over there and you can't do s*** about it. The only reason you don't hear about these wars is because they are just boring for the western press, they happen all the time.


Sending so called "peace keepers" is useless anyway. Just to let you know that the UN peace keepers are pretty much by definition are there to watch and nothing more. The second they see escalation in war between two nations they are ordered to withdraw. They never engage anyone in combat. That is why these APCs were probably a waste of money anyway as even without the peacekeepers telling so you'd probably know that s*** hit the fan between two nations ...

fr0stbyte124 wrote:

From now on, MercurySteam is required to freestyle all his posts.

I support this.

Tau wrote:

silence

it will fall.
Silence will fall when the [redacted] implode.

Fun fact, I'm half French